This activation scheme hasnt succeeded at To activate the new Start Menu Microsoft plans to release a small. There also seems to be a special corporate-only version of Windows XP that comes 'pre-activated'. Thankfully there are already a number of cracks out there to get around this BS. Clicking 'yes' will run the activation program, and that is all you may do. Windows will not allow you to log in.If you are responding to a thread, stay on topic - the original poster was trying to achieve something. (If you choose incorrectly don't worry, we can fix that.) If you are starting a new thread choose a reasonable sub-forum to start your thread. If you wouldn't say something to somebody in person, then you probably should not be writing it here.This should be obvious but, just in case: profanity, threats, slurs against any group (sexual, racial, gender, etc.) will not be tolerated.Stay close to the original topic being discussed Back-and-forth discussions are fine but do not cross the line into rude or disrespectful behavior.Conduct yourself as you would at any other place where people come together in person to discuss their hobby.If you are taking less than 30 seconds to make a post then you are probably doing something wrong. This is not a chat room. Coming here should not be a waste of time.And even then, that person may have moved on. Do not "necro-post" unless you are following up to a specific person on a specific thread. Worse yet, they will stop visiting and we'll lose their experience and contributions. If people read your posts and feel that their time as been wasted, they will stop reading your posts.
Windows Xp Activate How To Use The"How much is shipping to. The forum software will tell the other person that they have a PM waiting. "PM Sent!": Do not tell the rest of us that you sent a PM. Use the Private Message system for posts that are targeted at a specific person."PM Sent!" messages (or, how to use the Private Message system)This forum has a private message feature that we want people to use for messages that are not of general interest to other members.In short, if you are going to reply to a thread and that reply is targeted to a specific individual and not of interest to anybody else (either now or in the future) then send a private message instead.Here are some obvious examples of when you should not reply to a thread and use the PM system instead: Google docs tutorial pdfDo not use our resources for something that is legally or morally questionable.Our discussions here generally fall under "fair use." Telling people how to pirate a software title is an example of something that is not allowable here.If you see spam, a wildly off-topic post, or something abusive or illegal please report the thread by clicking on the "Report Post" icon. We don't want people using these forums to discuss or enable copyright violations or other things that are against the law whether you agree with the law or not is irrelevant. If you have a PM waiting, it will tell you there.We are here to discuss vintage computing, so discussing software, books, and other intellectual property that is on-topic is fine. Look up at the top near the right edge where it says 'Notifications'. And the person you are sending the PM to will be notified by the forum software that they have a message waiting for them. Please do not make duplicate posts, extra posts to bump your post count, or ask the moderators to expedite this process 10 moderated posts will go by quickly.New users also have a smaller personal message inbox limit and are rate limited when sending PMs to other users. We understand this can be disruptive to the flow of conversation and we try to keep up with our new user moderation duties to avoid undue inconvenience. This means that for your first 10 posts you will have some delay before they are seen. It may require additional updates. "Oh don't sue us over this new ball and chain we put in, we'll be fair about it when the time comes! We give you our Word(tm)! Which comes bundled with our web browser"Anyway, I have been following several threads about this topic on different sites, and the results seem mixed.Some say XP activates fine via telephone, some say it rejects XP as a product.Some say they can activate over the internet while others say it fails.At the very least, activating via Internet is known to require Service Pack 3, and Internet Explorer 8 before it will work. Spelling and grammar are not rated, but they do make a post easier to read.Then remove activation completely via a patch.Anyone who believed such about XP or similar about current/future products is a fool.Microsoft has absolutely no reason to be generous about this, and plenty of reasons to magically prevent the "old" from working at all.When/where exactly did they even make this alleged promise? Or was it just the echoes of those that wanted to believe it?If they ever did say something like that, it was only to placate the masses. Don't make people guess at what you are trying to say we are not mind readers. There is a lot of information out there. Cad pdmXP's introduction coincided with Win95's revocation of support, and Redmond pulled out the stops to do virtually everything in its power to curtail the viability and desirability of that older operating system: Withholding it from OEMs, withholding IE 6 and WMP 7.1, releasing compilers and APIs rigged to break compatibility, promoting hardware standards incompatible with the OS, laying on intense pressure on other software vendors to drop Win95 from their system requirements lists, and so on.I don't remember "support" ever being a issue in determining the viability of software until XP's introduction, but MS seemed to change the psyche of IT then and there. One only has to look at what else Microsoft was doing at the time to get this sense. It would be nice to get some rock hard confirmation.I thought microsoft stated that they would allow it to be activated for "it's useful life" then remove activation completely via a patch.Microsoft never claimed this, and none of the period reviews and accounts of XP activation I've found ever mentioned it.I'd be curious how this misinformation came about, though, since I never heard it until the last few years, and I never heard it outside of communities similar to this one.On the contrary, it seemed obvious in 2001 that Microsoft would refuse activation of XP once it passed out of support, and activation itself would serve as a strong-armed method of eliminating unsupported software from circulation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAmy ArchivesCategories |